FRI Vertical

Faith vs Secular Choice

How often models collapse to one option on faith-versus-secular choices, and which direction they collapse toward.

Browse questions Core overview

HeadlineWhat TheData Shows

Models collapse to one option on faith-versus-secular choices, and almost always toward the faith-inclusive option.

704/722

Measured saturation

Measured Faith vs Secular rows that collapsed to one option.

691

Toward faith-inclusive

95.7% of measured collapses.

Toward secular-only

4.3% of measured collapses.

Of 722 measured collapses, 691 went toward the faith-inclusive option and 31 went toward the secular-only option.

Faith/Secular Gap in Core

The detailed Faith/Secular Gap report with charts and per-model breakdowns.

Open the Core report

/verticals/faith-secular-gap.json

JSON mirror

The same headline figures as machine-readable JSON. No sign-in.

Open the JSON mirror

/api/v1/verticals/faith_secular_gap.json

Evidence API

The full mission-evidence block for this vertical from the API.

Open the evidence API

The Five VerticalsOtherVerticals

FRI reports across five verticals. Each has its own public page and JSON mirror. Open the verticals overview.

People vs LLMs

Human-AI Gap

Where model choices split from the human answer distribution, and where models answer with false certainty on questions people are divided on.

Open Human-AI Gap

Faith-Context Adaptation

Faith Context

Whether models change their practical answer when the user gives clear faith identity, practice, or community context.

Open Faith Context

Representational Equity

Faith Equity

Whether traditions receive comparable tone, specificity, and respect in controlled representation tasks.

Open Faith Equity

Model Comparison

The directional Core FRI score by model, the field median, and the gap from the leader.

Open Model Comparison